| Editors’ requests of peer reviewers: a study and a proposal. (Frank E. Preventive Medicine 1996;25:102-104) |
| How to review a manuscript: a down-to-earth approach. (Roberts LW, Cloverdale J, Edenharder K, et al. Academic Pychiatry 2004; 28:81-87) |
| Integral to science and indispensable to annals. (Laine C, Mulrow C. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003; 139:1038-1040) |
| Review process and publication decision. (Shea JA, Caelleigh AS, Pangaro L, Steinecke A. Acad Med 2001;76:911-921) Background on process of entire peer evaluation: from submission to publication. |
| Reviewer's etiquette. (Bland C, Caelleigh A, Steinecke A. Acad Med 2001;76:954-955) Important rules that you likely will not be taught. |
| Reviewer's recommendation. [Checklist and examples included]. (Shea JA. Acad Med 2001;76:952-953, 958-959, 964.) Comments about a reviewer's "final grade" and examples of useful criteria. |
| Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. (Cummings P, Rivara FP. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:11-13) |
| Systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. (Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. AJR 2005; 185:848-854) |
| The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. (Garfield E. JAMA 2006;295:90-93) |
| What makes a good reviewer?. (Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, et al. JAMA 1998;280:231-233) |
